Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s is better than vivo X60 Pro, having a score of 88 against 78.8. The Galaxy M31s body is thicker and heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user very similar operating system features. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger display. Samsung Galaxy M31s features a little bit more storage for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M31s features a slightly better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a larger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a superior battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.