Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than vivo X60 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 78.8. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 construction is older, somewhat thicker and heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Galaxy Note9 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.