Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a general score of 79.3 against 78.8. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. Galaxy S6 edge+'s design is a bit thinner and lighter than vivo X60 Pro, although it was released 6 years before.
Vivo X60 Pro features a better processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger aperture, a way more megapixels camera, faster video frame rates and a lot larger camera sensor taking much higher quality photos. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.