Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's general score of 76.4. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The vivo X60 Pro construction is noticeably newer and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's, although it's also heavier.
Vivo X60 Pro has a better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 8 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 5s features a bit sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels number in each inch in the screen.
Vivo X60 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back facing camera with way more MP, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a bigger camera sensor and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 31 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.