Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is much better than vivo X60's 75.1 score. Galaxy A7 (2018) is an a lot older and just a little thicker phone than vivo X60, but Samsung managed to build it just a little lighter anyway. The vivo X60 features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little bit lower pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Vivo X60 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM. The vivo X60 shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X60 has longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.