Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than vivo X60, with a general score of 81 against 75.1. Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is a little bit thinner than the vivo X60, but it is a little bit heavier and was released 4 years before. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and vivo X60 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X60 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit better pixel count per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2376. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The vivo X60 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X60 counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. The vivo X60 has a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture, a lot better resolution back facing camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.