Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is better than vivo X60, getting an 83.3 score against 75.1. Although Samsung Galaxy M30s is a better device than the vivo X60, we must note that it is also an older, a little heavier and thicker device. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Vivo X60 has a bit better performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X60 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a just a little worse pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 resolution.
Galaxy M30s features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a much better battery performance than vivo X60, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Vivo X60 features a bit better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a 48 MP resolution back camera, the same (4K) video definition and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the vivo X60 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.