Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is much better than the vivo X60's overall score of 75.1. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy M31s is an a lot thicker and heavier cellphone than vivo X60.
The vivo X60 has a little better processing power than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density and a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy M31s takes clearer photographs and videos than vivo X60, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy M31s features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M31s also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M31s counts with a really longer battery duration than vivo X60, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.