Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than vivo X60's 75.1 general score. Although it's the best we are comparing, Galaxy Note9 is a noticeably older, thicker and heavier cellphone than vivo X60. The vivo X60 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note9 has a little more vivid display than vivo X60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than vivo X60, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Vivo X60 takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 also counts with a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Vivo X60 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.