Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. Even though the iPhone X is a lot older than vivo X70 Pro, it's body is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner. IPhone X features a bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little higher pixel amount in each screen inch.
IPhone X and vivo X70 Pro both feature really similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone X counts with a bit faster processor than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Vivo X70 Pro has a superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 64 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.