Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 84.2 score against 78.3. The iPhone XS design is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than vivo X70 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone XS counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit faster processing unit than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and 8 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The vivo X70 Pro has a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better camera than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.