Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. The Google Pixel 3 construction has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display density.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality photos and videos, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a camera with much more megapixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
Vivo X70 Pro features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 53% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.