Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction has the same thickness and weight than the vivo X70 Pro. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low-light images and video, a camera with a much better resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and faster video frame rate.
Vivo X70 Pro has better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 30 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.