Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 3a is incredibly older and a little bit thicker than vivo X70 Pro, it's construction is still way lighter. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The vivo X70 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, better 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 48% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.