Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 81.9 score against 78.3. Although the Google Pixel 4 is older and a bit thicker than vivo X70 Pro, it's body is still lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro features a little better performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 2800mAh. The vivo X70 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.