Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Even being the best we compare here, Google Pixel 4 XL is an older, just a little thicker and a little heavier cellphone than vivo X70 Pro. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher screen density. Vivo X70 Pro features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4450mAh battery size. Vivo X70 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.