Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Just black |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Google Pixel 4a's body is notably lighter than vivo X70 Pro, but it's a little thicker and was released about 14 months before. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Vivo X70 Pro has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a counts with a slightly better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
The vivo X70 Pro features a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4450mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.