Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, having an 87.5 score against 78.3. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give the same OS features. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is older and just a bit thicker than vivo X70 Pro, it's design is still a bit lighter.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The vivo X70 Pro has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X70 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.