Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. The Google Pixel 5 is a lighter phone than the vivo X70 Pro, but they are equally thin. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The vivo X70 Pro has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro features a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.