Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 395 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a global score of 92.1, which is much better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's construction is extremely newer than vivo X70 Pro's, but it is thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better display than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels, a little bigger display and a bit better display pixel density. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a little bit better performance than vivo X70 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 768 GB more internal storage capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X70 Pro, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 50 mega-pixels resolution, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has longer battery performance than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.