Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a score of 78.3, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but vivo X70 Pro has 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. The vivo X70 Pro is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than HTC One M9, although it is somewhat heavier.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better hardware performance than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics co-processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density.
The vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way larger aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments, a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way more megapixels camera.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.