Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro has a global score of 78.3, which is slightly better than the HTC U11's general score of 77.6. Vivo X70 Pro is a just a bit heavier phone than the HTC U11, but both are 0.31inches thick. HTC U11 features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better display density.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit superior processor than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro takes way better photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a way more mega pixels back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 48% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.