Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. LG V30S ThinQ is an way older cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but it's a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a better pixel count in each inch in the screen. The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution camera.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.