Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the vivo X70 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little faster processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features more storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X70 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor, better video frame rate and a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The vivo X70 Pro has superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.