Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 78.3. LG V40 ThinQ's design is a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the vivo X70 Pro, although it was released many years before. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V40 ThinQ counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X70 Pro features a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor and a way more megapixels back camera.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.