Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Microsoft |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's design is notably heavier but a lot thinner than the vivo X70 Pro, and both of them were released with only 0 months difference. These phones have the same Android 11 OS.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a little bit greater screen pixels density, a higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 and a larger display.
The vivo X70 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a battery duration that's just as good as the battery life in vivo X70 Pro, although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.