Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than vivo X70 Pro, getting a general score of 87 against 78.3. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it's a little bit heavier. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Motorola razr (2020)'s storage for apps and games is very similar to vivo X70 Pro's one, they have the same internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. Vivo X70 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has better video frame rate, a back camera with more megapixels and a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.