Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Sonic silver |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but vivo X70 Pro has a more recent 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features. The vivo X70 Pro design is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S.
Vivo X70 Pro features just a little better performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The vivo X70 Pro has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures a bit better photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with much more MP.
The nubia Red Magic 5S's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in vivo X70 Pro, although the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a 1% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.