Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has an overall score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A30 design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than vivo X70 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Vivo X70 Pro has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite larger display.
The vivo X70 Pro features a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro has a better processing unit than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a much more megapixels back camera.
Vivo X70 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A30, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.