Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro, with an 81.3 score against 78.3. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is better than the vivo X70 Pro, it must be told that it is also an older, just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker phone.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X70 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has a camera with a better resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.