Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a global score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy A41 is a lighter cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but they are 0.31inches thick. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Vivo X70 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a slightly better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Vivo X70 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures, a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a more megapixels camera in the back.
Vivo X70 Pro has a better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A41, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.