Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), having a score of 78.3 against 75.8. Vivo X70 Pro's construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), but it is somewhat heavier. Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A5 (2017) have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch of display. The vivo X70 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 48 percent bigger battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.