Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a overall score of 83.8 against 78.3. Although the Galaxy A50 is older than the vivo X70 Pro, it's body is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Galaxy A50 has a display that is very similar to the screen in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density.
Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much better (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution. The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.