Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, with an 86.6 score against 78.3. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is a little lighter and a little thinner than vivo X70 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50s and vivo X70 Pro both have extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels count per inch of screen.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a camera with more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and faster video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.