Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a score of 85.5 against 78.3. The Galaxy A51 is a just a little lighter cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but they have the same thickness. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should count with identical operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy A51 and vivo X70 Pro count with quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution, faster 60 fps video frame rate, a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.