Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism cube black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G features a display that is very similar to the vivo X70 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number in each screen inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments, higher video frame rates, a lot larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera with more MP.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a greater storage to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G both feature really similar battery performance, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.