Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | -- |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. Although it's the best in this review, the Galaxy A52 body is a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the vivo X70 Pro. Vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A52 count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a camera that's just as good as the camera in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a tinier aperture, lower video frame rates and a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video definition, it also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Vivo X70 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52 both have quite similar batteries performance, although the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.