Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | -- |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A52 5G is an a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and vivo X70 Pro both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit greater screen density.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a camera that's just as good as the vivo X70 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has lower video frame rate, a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A52 5G has more storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a battery performance that's very similar to the battery life in vivo X70 Pro, although the Galaxy A52 5G also has a 1% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.