Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a better cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, it must be noted that it's also a a bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro and the Galaxy A52s both feature similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52s has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a camera that's very similar to vivo X70 Pro's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs, lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a quite bigger memory for applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with a battery life that's just as good as vivo X70 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Galaxy A52s also has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.