Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a global score of 78.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Vivo X70 Pro's body has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it is just a little heavier. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X70 Pro has 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
The vivo X70 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70's battery performance is just as good as the vivo X70 Pro one, although the Galaxy A70 also has a 1% bigger battery size.
Vivo X70 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has faster video frame rates and a way larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.