Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is much better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 87.5 score against 78.3. Galaxy A71 is an older cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it a bit lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels number per inch of screen. Galaxy A71 features a little bit better storage for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a battery performance that's very similar to vivo X70 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images in low-light environments, lower video frame rate and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photographs, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.