Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism bricks black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the vivo X70 Pro, it must be noted that it is also an older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy A71 5G UW and vivo X70 Pro count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates, a smaller sensor and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW's battery lifetime is very similar to the vivo X70 Pro one, although the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a 1 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.