Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 (2018) has a general score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Galaxy A8 (2018) is an a lot older and a little bit thicker phone than vivo X70 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a bit sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little better processing power than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Vivo X70 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The vivo X70 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 Pro has a superior battery performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.