Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a little lighter phone than vivo X70 Pro, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bigger display, a quite higher screen density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376px. The vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 17 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.