Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-09-30 | -- |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha's 76.3 score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X70 Pro has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. Vivo X70 Pro's construction is thicker and incredibly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
Vivo X70 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 10 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. Galaxy Alpha has a bit sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, although it has a little bit worse pixel quantity per display inch, a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720 and a much smaller screen.
The vivo X70 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a camera with a way higher resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 139% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.