Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a global score of 85.2 against 78.3. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. Although it's the best we are comparing, Galaxy F41 is an older, a little heavier and thicker phone than the vivo X70 Pro.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features greater battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. The Galaxy F41 features a camera that's very similar to vivo X70 Pro's camera, because although the Galaxy F41 has a tinier diafragm aperture, a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, it also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.