Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than vivo X70 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 78.3. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even being the best we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy F62 design is heavier and thicker than the vivo X70 Pro. Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Vivo X70 Pro captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images.
Galaxy F62 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery performance than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 57% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.