Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, providing you a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Galaxy Fold's design is thinner than vivo X70 Pro, but it is heavier and was released many years before.
The vivo X70 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Fold. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 12 GB RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4450mAh battery size. Vivo X70 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.