Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a 78.9 score against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy M20's design is older, thicker and just a little bit heavier than vivo X70 Pro. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has older 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2376. The vivo X70 Pro features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X70 Pro has a better CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Vivo X70 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light environments, a way larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.