Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 85 score against 78.3. The Galaxy M40 is a a little lighter cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy M40 has 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy M40 and vivo X70 Pro count with extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy M40 has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Vivo X70 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has better video frame rate, a way bigger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy M40 counts with slightly more storage to store more games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X70 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.